Skip to main content

Review of The Mental Healthcare Act,2017



By Ragini Chatterjee
(Overall Grade Remedial) 

                                                                  The Mental Healthcare Act, 2017 outlines rights that definitely improve the judicial status of the mentally ill. The Act starts with defining certain terms that are found later, throughout the act. The act adheres to international standards with the aim of securing the rights of people with mental illness in accordance with the United Nation’s Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UNCRPD), as stated in the first three paragraphs. The Act has replaced the previous 1937 Act. In this review of the Act, I shall start by highlighting what I found interesting, following which, I shall view the Merits and the Demerits of this Act.
The first point that caught my eye was the definition of mental illness within the Act. The act doesn’t apply to the mentally retarded, who comprise a good portion of the mentally ill population. The Act explicitly states — “mental illness”, means a substantial disorder of thinking, mood, perception, orientation or memory that grossly impairs judgment, behavior, capacity to recognize reality or ability to meet the ordinary demands of life, mental conditions associated with the abuse of alcohol and drugs, but does not include mental retardation which is a condition of arrested or incomplete development of mind of a person, specially characterized by sub normality of intelligence.
Another aspect that was interesting was the ‘Advance Directive’, which allows for the patient to put forward their preferred method of treatment and also allows them to elect a representative, who would make decisions regarding their Healthcare needs. While reading this, I didn’t know whether this facet could be classified into the narrow categories of — merit and demerit. While ‘Advance Directive’ definitely shows that the law is committed to respect the mentally ill. It may overestimate the ability of the mentally ill to make these decisions, when the very definition of mental illness states that it is a substantial disorder that grossly impairs judgment. The Act however, does acknowledge that there are times when the mentally ill cannot take decisions in their best interest and therefore, allow for the appointment of a representative. 
The other Merits of the Act in my opinion lie in the decriminalization of Attempt to Suicide. The Act states — “115. (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in section 309 of the Indian Penal Code any person who attempts to commit suicide shall be presumed, unless proved otherwise, to have severe stress and shall not be tried and punished under the said Code.” It also enables the mentally ill with the right to access mental healthcare and treatment, the right to free treatment (for those below the poverty line). Other powerful merits that allow the right to live with dignity are, not being subject to electro-convulsive therapy without muscle-relaxants and anesthesia, not to be chained or put in solitary confinement and the right to confidentiality. Sterilization is also prohibited.
However, the Act talks about an idealistic Review Board and Mental Healthcare authorities at the Central and State levels. Most of the rights outlined in the act cannot come to play without allotment of facilities for the fulfillment of the clauses. Especially in India, where Mental healthcare isn’t an established sector, where there are pre-existing resources. The development of these resources will need investments. The budget for the healthcare sector, in totality, comprises 1-2% of the Union Budget. Furthermore, the few skilled mental health practitioners in the country fail to be enough to substantially improve mental health of the country. The Act, while emancipating the mental ill, does little for the prevention of mental illness.
In conclusion, the Mental Healthcare Act will definitely prove to be a step forward for India, if it is implemented in its true spirit. It is quite progressive and shows the changing views towards mental illness. Focus has shifted from the threat the mentally ill may pose to society, to recognizing the mentally ill, as individuals, who have rights. The act hopefully helps in de-stigmatization of mental illness in society. The success of this act can’t be judged as it has just been approved by the Rajya Sabha in the August of 2017. However, if adequate resources aren’t allocated to fund this ambitious dream, India may never come to realize it.














Works Referenced;
The Gazette of India, Mental Health Care Act, 2017.





Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Hardin's trauma

“After”, is a 2019 teen romantic drama directed by jenny gage that revolves around the love of  Tessa, an inexperienced teenage girl, with Hardin, a mysterious ‘bad boy’ . Hardin, the main male character, never had a secure relationship with his father. When Hardin was young, his father used to be an alcoholic with a lot of debt. When he was just eight years old, intruders broke into his home looking for his father for money, however, there was only Hardin and his mother. The intruders forced themselves on Hardin’s mother, and Hardin, who was sleeping then, came downstairs to see what was wrong. To Hardin’s shock, his mother was being raped by three men, one by one. Hardin’s mother told him to leave, however, one man forced him to watch everything.  I would assume that Hardin has PTSD as a result of this incident, and in this paper I will try to prove it. Symptoms of PTSD and scenes that prove Hardin had it: The person subsequently re-experiences the event through both intrusi...

Analysing “Anniyan”: Dissociative Identity Disorder meets Personality Disorders

Pranaya Prakash In the movie “Anniyan” (Shankar, 2005), the protagonist Ramanujam Iyengar, also known as Ambi, is the host of his alters: Remo and Anniyan. While the focus of the movie is only on Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID), also known as Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD), the host, Ambi, and the alter, Anniyan, show symptoms of Obsessive-Compulsive Personality Disorder (OCPD) and Antisocial Personality Disorder (ASPD), respectively. In this blog post, I attempt to critically analyse the portrayal of DID and the possibility of the protagonist having comorbid Personality Disorders. While it is highly unlikely for individuals with DID to have comorbidities with Personality Disorders ( Antisocial Personality Disorder ), especially with OCPD and ASPD (Fink, 1991), it is interesting to think of the possibility and analyse the developmental trajectory of these individuals.  The movie starts with the character development of Ambi, a lawyer who is meticulous and very particular ...

The Psychological Depth of Good Will Hunting

Shorya Sehgal Good Will Hunting revolves around the interaction of two rebellious characters, Sean Maguire and Will Hunting, who, to a certain extent, help each other to conform slightly. Will is a brilliant but troubled, young adult. He suffers from post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), inferiority complex, defence mechanisms and attachment disorder. A mathematical genius, Will had a complete disrespect for authority and for his own considerable talents. As the story progressed, I was able to see Will’s personal growth as he developed an extremely strong relationship with his therapist, Sean. Sean had fought his own battles in life which had made him tough. This significantly helped Will and Sean to connect to each other on a deep, emotional level. What struck me the most in the movie is how coherently Will's journey is tied together. His transition from an inexpressive, troubled young guy to a mature and responsible one is shown very exquisitely. By the end, he was able to be...