Skip to main content

Dehumanising the human- Rhythm 0 Experiment


Anu Khandelwal


 While growing up, we are all imparted social and ethical values by our family and friends- to be respectful towards others, accept other viewpoints and to be cognizant of one’s pain and emotions. While this might seem ordinary, here lies the underlying problem: not many people are fortunate enough to be born and raised in a safe environment, receiving the same values and developing a sense of empathy in situations that heavily demand attention and care. 
Marina Abramovic, a performance artist, took it upon herself to measure people’s lack of empathy and disregard for human life. In the experiment, Rhythm 0, Marina created a disturbing artwork- she stood blindfolded in front of a table that had 72 objects placed on it. While some of the instruments were simply for pleasure, others were not. The list of objects ranged from a rose, a feather, a glass of water, a lipstick, a shoe to dangerous instruments such as a knife, a razor blade, a hammer and a loaded pistol. 
There was a self-written note placed by Marina on the table that informed her audience that she would stand still for the next six hours and they can use these objects on her body as per their liking. Written on the note was also a very alarming message- “I am the object.”
Initially, people remained hesitant in nature and would simply lift her arm or make her hold the rose. But soon after, they became restless and vicious. 
Her clothes were torn apart and she was subjected to physical and sexual assault. Her neck was slit with a knife by one participant from the audience who later on, proceeded to drink  blood from her bruised neck. Half naked, Marina was carried to a table and a knife was thrusted between her legs into the table. 
The turning point of the experiment was when a member of the audience made her hold the pistol in her hand encouraging her to pull the trigger. This resulted into a huge conflict by another participant who threw the gun outside the window. Throughout the course of the experiment, Marina displayed no signs of mobility and maintained her position. 
As soon as six hours had passed by, Marina stood up with tears in her eyes and started to walk away. The entire crowd scattered as they had been reviewing her as an object due to her absolute silence, no signs of objection and immobility. They had not anticipated her in a light where they could perceive her as an equal- a human being just like them. 
The rationale behind this experiment was to arrive at the conclusion that people can go to any extent to prove a point. They had dehumanised Marina in a horrifying manner and inflicted several degrees of pain on her body. 
Interestingly, the results of this experiment were in contrast to the results of Milgram's experiment where volunteers were asked to electrocute a person as per the orders given to them by the authorities. Blind obedience or obedience to authority was a crucial catalyst in performing Milgram’s experiment. However, signs of reluctance and distress were also recorded amongst the volunteers while they were instructed to inflict higher degree of pain on another person.
In the aforementioned experiment, we observe that people protested against the instructions and were conscious of the fact that they were being hostile towards a living human being capable of emotions and sentiments.
While on the other hand, in the experiment Rhythm 0, the members of the audience did not display signs of uneasiness or discomfort in the process of degenerating Marina to a horrifying extent. 
After six hours of absolute horror, Marina spoke about her experience stating, “If you leave it up to the audience, they can kill you.”
Rhythm 0 gave a new direction to the study of social psychology- people can go to appalling lengths as they poorly distinguish between what is right or wrong. They can turn a blind eye to their own conscience and gravely engage in acts of terror.
Through the implementation of her experiment, Marina was also able to prove another point, that is, performance art is real and can leave performers scarred and devastated for the rest of their lives. 

CITATIONS
  1. Mcleod, S. (2017, February 5). The Milgram Experiment. Retrieved from https://www.simplypsychology.org/milgram.html.
  2. Reality 0 - A Terrifying Experiment. (2014, May 22). Retrieved from https://johndopp.com/reality-0-marina-abramovic/. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Hardin's trauma

“After”, is a 2019 teen romantic drama directed by jenny gage that revolves around the love of  Tessa, an inexperienced teenage girl, with Hardin, a mysterious ‘bad boy’ . Hardin, the main male character, never had a secure relationship with his father. When Hardin was young, his father used to be an alcoholic with a lot of debt. When he was just eight years old, intruders broke into his home looking for his father for money, however, there was only Hardin and his mother. The intruders forced themselves on Hardin’s mother, and Hardin, who was sleeping then, came downstairs to see what was wrong. To Hardin’s shock, his mother was being raped by three men, one by one. Hardin’s mother told him to leave, however, one man forced him to watch everything.  I would assume that Hardin has PTSD as a result of this incident, and in this paper I will try to prove it. Symptoms of PTSD and scenes that prove Hardin had it: The person subsequently re-experiences the event through both intrusi...
Post a Comment
Read more

Analysing “Anniyan”: Dissociative Identity Disorder meets Personality Disorders

Pranaya Prakash In the movie “Anniyan” (Shankar, 2005), the protagonist Ramanujam Iyengar, also known as Ambi, is the host of his alters: Remo and Anniyan. While the focus of the movie is only on Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID), also known as Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD), the host, Ambi, and the alter, Anniyan, show symptoms of Obsessive-Compulsive Personality Disorder (OCPD) and Antisocial Personality Disorder (ASPD), respectively. In this blog post, I attempt to critically analyse the portrayal of DID and the possibility of the protagonist having comorbid Personality Disorders. While it is highly unlikely for individuals with DID to have comorbidities with Personality Disorders ( Antisocial Personality Disorder ), especially with OCPD and ASPD (Fink, 1991), it is interesting to think of the possibility and analyse the developmental trajectory of these individuals.  The movie starts with the character development of Ambi, a lawyer who is meticulous and very particular ...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Psychological Depth of Good Will Hunting

Shorya Sehgal Good Will Hunting revolves around the interaction of two rebellious characters, Sean Maguire and Will Hunting, who, to a certain extent, help each other to conform slightly. Will is a brilliant but troubled, young adult. He suffers from post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), inferiority complex, defence mechanisms and attachment disorder. A mathematical genius, Will had a complete disrespect for authority and for his own considerable talents. As the story progressed, I was able to see Will’s personal growth as he developed an extremely strong relationship with his therapist, Sean. Sean had fought his own battles in life which had made him tough. This significantly helped Will and Sean to connect to each other on a deep, emotional level. What struck me the most in the movie is how coherently Will's journey is tied together. His transition from an inexpressive, troubled young guy to a mature and responsible one is shown very exquisitely. By the end, he was able to be...
Post a Comment
Read more