Skip to main content

Dehumanising the human- Rhythm 0 Experiment


Anu Khandelwal


 While growing up, we are all imparted social and ethical values by our family and friends- to be respectful towards others, accept other viewpoints and to be cognizant of one’s pain and emotions. While this might seem ordinary, here lies the underlying problem: not many people are fortunate enough to be born and raised in a safe environment, receiving the same values and developing a sense of empathy in situations that heavily demand attention and care. 
Marina Abramovic, a performance artist, took it upon herself to measure people’s lack of empathy and disregard for human life. In the experiment, Rhythm 0, Marina created a disturbing artwork- she stood blindfolded in front of a table that had 72 objects placed on it. While some of the instruments were simply for pleasure, others were not. The list of objects ranged from a rose, a feather, a glass of water, a lipstick, a shoe to dangerous instruments such as a knife, a razor blade, a hammer and a loaded pistol. 
There was a self-written note placed by Marina on the table that informed her audience that she would stand still for the next six hours and they can use these objects on her body as per their liking. Written on the note was also a very alarming message- “I am the object.”
Initially, people remained hesitant in nature and would simply lift her arm or make her hold the rose. But soon after, they became restless and vicious. 
Her clothes were torn apart and she was subjected to physical and sexual assault. Her neck was slit with a knife by one participant from the audience who later on, proceeded to drink  blood from her bruised neck. Half naked, Marina was carried to a table and a knife was thrusted between her legs into the table. 
The turning point of the experiment was when a member of the audience made her hold the pistol in her hand encouraging her to pull the trigger. This resulted into a huge conflict by another participant who threw the gun outside the window. Throughout the course of the experiment, Marina displayed no signs of mobility and maintained her position. 
As soon as six hours had passed by, Marina stood up with tears in her eyes and started to walk away. The entire crowd scattered as they had been reviewing her as an object due to her absolute silence, no signs of objection and immobility. They had not anticipated her in a light where they could perceive her as an equal- a human being just like them. 
The rationale behind this experiment was to arrive at the conclusion that people can go to any extent to prove a point. They had dehumanised Marina in a horrifying manner and inflicted several degrees of pain on her body. 
Interestingly, the results of this experiment were in contrast to the results of Milgram's experiment where volunteers were asked to electrocute a person as per the orders given to them by the authorities. Blind obedience or obedience to authority was a crucial catalyst in performing Milgram’s experiment. However, signs of reluctance and distress were also recorded amongst the volunteers while they were instructed to inflict higher degree of pain on another person.
In the aforementioned experiment, we observe that people protested against the instructions and were conscious of the fact that they were being hostile towards a living human being capable of emotions and sentiments.
While on the other hand, in the experiment Rhythm 0, the members of the audience did not display signs of uneasiness or discomfort in the process of degenerating Marina to a horrifying extent. 
After six hours of absolute horror, Marina spoke about her experience stating, “If you leave it up to the audience, they can kill you.”
Rhythm 0 gave a new direction to the study of social psychology- people can go to appalling lengths as they poorly distinguish between what is right or wrong. They can turn a blind eye to their own conscience and gravely engage in acts of terror.
Through the implementation of her experiment, Marina was also able to prove another point, that is, performance art is real and can leave performers scarred and devastated for the rest of their lives. 

CITATIONS
  1. Mcleod, S. (2017, February 5). The Milgram Experiment. Retrieved from https://www.simplypsychology.org/milgram.html.
  2. Reality 0 - A Terrifying Experiment. (2014, May 22). Retrieved from https://johndopp.com/reality-0-marina-abramovic/. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Burari Deaths: The Psychopathology of Lalit, a Biopsychosocial Perspective

Pankhudi Narayan Blogpost 1  TW: Death, mentions of suicide.         On July 1st of 2018, eleven members of a family were found dead in their shared home in the Burari area of Delhi. The deaths seemed to be fashioned in a ritualistic manner and evidence suggested that the family members were willing participants. This was the Bhatia family, a typical middle-class Indian joint family. Bhopal Singh who had passed away and his wife Narayani Devi formed the older generations of the family and were Lalith’s parents. The most compelling evidence in the uncovering of the events that led to the death of an entire family was provided by eleven diaries found by authorities. The diaries described the events that transpired before the deaths, discussing a ritual that needed to be conducted and the diary entries were corroborated by the post mortem findings as the accounts were found to be consistent with injuries (Yadav et al., 2021). It was uncovered that Lalit, a member of the family who was the
Post a Comment
Read more

Made in Heaven: An analysis of Faiza Naqvi

Vyoma Vijai Blog Post 3 ‘Made in Heaven’ is a popular Indian web series created by Zoya Akhtar and Reema Kaagti and was launched in March 2018. The show gained a lot of attention in the first few days of it coming out. It is a bold show that focuses on marriage practices in the rich and elite class of Delhi. The show focuses on the social issues and practices that are often not spoken of or are kept closeted. These issues include homosexuality, dowry, molestation and other questionable Indian customs. The story follows the lives of multiple characters at the same time. The two most important characters are Tara and Karan who run a wedding planning agency.   Tara is married to a rich industrialist whose name is Adil and her best friend in the show is Faiza, played by Kalki Koechlin. This essay analyses Faiza’s character and her role in this web series. Faiza is a complex character to understand. Her actions make it hard for the viewers to decide whether they l
Post a Comment
Read more

Disorderly Delvian: A Deep Dive into "Anna Delvey" through the Lens of NPD

       A markedly thick accent, a mop of blonde hair, a magical array of unimaginably expensive clothing, and an air of calculated mystery mesh uncomfortably together to invent Anna Delvey, the centre of Netflix’s appropriately named documentary/drama series, “Inventing Anna”. This series tells or rather retells the fascinating story of how one woman deceived the creme de la creme of New York society as well as some prestigious financial institutions under the guise that she was a wealthy heiress from Germany. The series follows a journalist, Vivian Kent, as she tries to uncover the carefully constructed web of lies Anna spun around high society after her arrest, heavily interspersed by flashbacks, present-day court hearings, and interviews with the enigma herself (Shondaland, 2022). Anna as a character, infused with a troubling reality and a dramatised narrative, presents an interesting scope to study the symptomatology of Narcissistic Personality Disorder as presented in her behaviou
Post a Comment
Read more