Skip to main content

Em and The Big Hoom: A Tale of Love, Loss, and Schizophrenia


Nethra Palepu 

In “Em and the Big Hoom”, author Jerry Pinto spins a narrative surrounding what it is like to live with a schizophrenic mother, from the perspective of his adolescent self. This book is remarkably candid, witty, and unapologetic in its depiction of schizophrenia and all that comes with it. As Sarin notes in his analysis of the book, Em and the Big Hoom is not just a story about mental illness -- it is a story about what it is to be a family, about being mentally ill while bearing the responsibility of being a mother and a wife, and about the grief and helplessness that comes with it all. Imelda (Em)’s adolescent son, the unnamed narrator of this story, tries to deal with his own adolescent experiences while simultaneously acting as a support-system, guide, friend, son, and even parent to his schizophrenic mother. The book puts forward an unvarnished account of what a life like this looks like, both from the perspective of Em as well as her son.
The book narrates accurate depictions of Em’s manic and depressive phases, the effects of her illness on herself and her family, and the reality of therapy and medical treatments for a condition like schizophrenia. Through a symptomatic lens, Em experiences frequent hallucinations, has trouble thinking logically, has recurrently attempted suicide, often talks in a disorganized manner, and doesn’t have an interest in everyday activities like sex (She says: “Mad people don’t want sex. They kick the sex drive out of you with those pills. No, even before that. There is so much in your head that you can’t bear any distractions…”).
Pinto specifically talks of his mother’s disorganized way of talking: “Conversations with Em could be like wandering in a town you had never seen before, where every path you took might change course midway and take you with it…”.  The book also captures quite a few instances of her hallucinations -- Em would hear voices in her head, see people, and as a result, would be paranoid about “their” actions. Several times, she would act according to what the voices “tell” her to do. For example, the narrator attaches a note written by Em:

I have to get you all out of here. If they come for us, they must not get us all. [....] Go. Go away. Himself and I can manage. We’ll go down together, in flames. We can take it. We’ve lived and loved. You haven’t. [...] You must go. Soon. But wait for my birthday. And get me a Cadbury’s chocolate. Cad equals Catholic. Bury all the Catholics. Don’t tell anyone.”

Here, we see that Em fully believes her delusions and justifies her actions based on them. She is extremely paranoid about the people in her head and believes that they are after her and her family. Besides this, she instructs her son to “bury all the Catholics”, once again, a delusion that only she understands. In a conversation with her son, Em also talks about what her depression feels like and about her attempt at committing suicide:

“After you were born, someone turned on a tap. At first it was only a drip, a black drip, and I felt it as sadness. I had felt sad before . . . who hasn't? [..]There is no drain. It’s like oil. Like molasses, slow at first. Then one morning I woke up and it was flowing and free and fast. I thought I would drown in it. I thought I would drown little you, and Susan. So I got up and got dressed and went out onto the road and tried to jump in front of a bus. I thought it would be a final thing, quick, like a bang. Only it wasn’t.”

This, in my opinion, is one of the rawest depictions of depression that I have come across. She feels trapped and overwhelmed by her sadness, like she is drowning in it -- as depression often feels like. Her attempt at killing herself was not just to escape this pervasive sadness, but to protect her children from it as well. This is also something that struck me -- that Em often tries to “protect” her children from herself, her illness, as well as from the people inside her head. We constantly see her try to be a mother and a wife -- by her attempts at saving her family, being there for them, and sometimes even apologising for “messing them up”.
Pinto also talks about an extremely relevant “problem” that arises in interacting with a mentally ill person: the blurring of the line between the individual’s personality and their illness. Sarin, in his critique of the book, argues that when clinicians “reconstitute” their patient’s story in order to diagnose them, symptomatic evidence as well as individual characteristics of the patient tend to merge. This leads to what he terms as “clinical impersonality”, which constitutes the lack of separation between an individual’s personality and their disorder. Although this might specifically be an issue from a clinical perspective, Pinto puts forward a different narrative -- based on a more personal interaction with his mother. He says that, sometimes, it is necessary to attribute the behaviour of his mother to her illness purely for self-preservation.

“ “Thats not her, it’s her problem,” Susan once said to me, when she found me weeping because of something Em had said. It became a way of escaping the sharpness of her tongue and [...] a way of escaping her as a person. We could always dismiss what she was saying as an emanation of her madness, not an insult or a hurt or a real critique to be taken seriously.”

Finally, the narrator talks about the various kinds of medication and treatment methods that they have tried on his mother. He feels that a lot of these medications are largely futile -- that they are aimed only at symptomatic relief, but underneath, nothing changes. Underneath, his mother is still in almost a different universe that cannot be reached. Em also undergoes Electro-Convulsive Therapy, returning almost as a different person -- she has “nothing in her eyes”, a red burn mark on her head where the electricity went, a brief loss in memory, and is essentially “a caricature of herself”. The narrator expresses his dislike for forceful “treatments” of this kind and strongly argues that his mother’s disorder is not something that can be fully be cured. According to him, this is just how her brain is, through and through -- this is an important perspective to consider when we look at the diagnosis and treatment of mental illnesses.
Em and The Big Hoom, a book that will make you laugh as much as it will make you cry, is a more than accurate portrayal of what it is like to be schizophrenic and to live with someone who is mentally ill. It brings forward necessary and relevant ideas, ideas that are heavily contested in the field of psychology itself -- including what the “right” treatments are, if there are any at all.


Bibliography
Pinto, J. (n.d.). Em and the Big Hoom. Aleph Book Company.
Sarin, A. (2013, October). Em and the Big Hoom: A book review. Indian Journal of Psychiatry.
Frankenburg, F. R. (2018, March 16). Schizophrenia. (G. L. Xiong, Editor) Retrieved November 30, 2018, from Medscape: https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/288259-overview
Shirley M. Glynn, K. K. (n.d.). Recognizing the signs of schizophrenia. Retrieved November 30, 2018, from American Psychological Association: https://www.apa.org/helpcenter/recognizing-schizophrenia.aspx


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

PTSD and its relationship with defense mechanisms and empathy: Character analysis of Levi Ackerman (SnK)

|Indira Bulhan Blog post: 1 “Manga is for kids” (My ignorant friend, 2018). Manga is often treated by people as something which is not so serious. However, it holds within itself some dark aspects of humanity. One such example is Shingeki no Kyojin (Attack on Titan). In it, the character of Levi Ackerman has been through a series of events which sets him apart from the people around him. Through this blog post, I will look upon the nature of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and its relationship with defense mechanisms and empathy.     Levi’s past is filled with events which can act as strong stressors for the development of trauma: the death of his mother at an early age, abandonment by father, raised by his uncle in the underworld in a highly unhygienic and malnourished state (who later abandons him again), death of his two closest friends and lover. Post-traumatic stress disorder or PTSD can be defined as a mental disorder which can happen to peopl...

Is Patrick Jane a psychopath?

Under the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), Psychopathy was never recognized, until the revised DSM-5 categorized it under Anti-Social Personality Disorder. “He will choose you, disarm you with his words, and control you with his presence” (Hare)  Psychopaths can replicate the behavior which the person they are interacting with thinks they want from them, without feeling a thing, which contributes greatly to their ability to manipulate. Psychopaths charm and lie their way seamlessly to the top, and while they lack empathy, they are well-liked because they know what to say and when to say it. Psychopaths occupy most of the positions of power in our society and corporations and thus often end up being glorified. This glorification of psychopaths is most evident in the portrayal of psychopathy in TV shows. Some of the most notable characters which the screen has ever seen, like Marlo Stanfield from ‘The Wire’, James Moriarty from ‘Sherlock’, Hanni...

Patrick Bateman: A Successful Psychopath

Abigail D'Souza Personality disorders are psychological disorders characterised by rigid and pervasive patterns of behaviour that persist over time. These must be maladaptive, or cause clinically significant distress to the individual, and are typically recognizable by late adolescence, or early adulthood. The most commonly known personality disorder is Antisocial Personality Disorder (ASPD), or rather Psychopathy, since people often assume the two are synonymous. They aren’t.   ASPD belongs to the Cluster B group of personality disorders, along with Histrionic, Narcissistic, and Borderline personality disorders. Individuals with these tend to be dramatic, emotional, and erratic (Hooley et al., 2021). ASPD is characterised by a lack of moral or ethical development; inability to follow approved models of behaviour; deceitfulness; manipulation of others; history of conduct problems as a child, etc. (Hooley et al., 2021). Psychopathy however, is more a set of traits, like superfi...