Skip to main content

A Critique of Freud's Theory of Psychoanalysis

Mihika Poore



Sigmund Freud was a neurologist and contributed immensely by proposing various theories that provide insight into several psychological disorders. He earned extreme popularity when he made a game-changing discovery of Psychoanalysis which treated problems that had roots below the surface of conscious life (Kunst, 2014). This blog attempts to reveal some of the objections and shortcomings of Freud’s psychoanalytical theory. 

Freud worked with many subjects, amongst which Dora’s case has been the most exclusive though unsuccessful. Dora was Freud’s pseudonym for an 18-year-old girl, Ida Bauer who was earlier diagnosed with Hysteria. Her problem started with nervous coughing, loss of voice and migraine which turned her into a person who became reclusive and wished to commit suicide. She claimed to have been sexually abused. Her family history of mental illnesses showed that her mother suffered from housewife psychosis and her father also suffered from ill-health long ago (Akavia, 2005). 

Regardless of the consistent use of psychoanalysis in the treatment of subjects, Freud’s therapy has been in the center of debates for ages. His psychoanalytical approach has been disapproved by neo-Freudians such as Karen Horney. 
In the interpretation of dreams, Freud associates the focus of dreams to wish fulfillment. People have many desires that they would like to act on but cannot because of social restrictions or self-imposed sense of ethics. Dreams tell what id, ego, super ego tend to hide. However, I doubt that Freud could associate the real meaning to them because his interpretations were very specific and unreasonable; connecting children to genitals was one of them (Freud & Bonaparte, 1954). This disassociation would cause ignorance in figuring out its true meaning and therefore increase difficulty in treatment. The erroneous results were also derived because of the difference in the viewpoint of Freud and his subjects. Freud came up with the notion of reversal of affect, which said that the emotion expressed by the subject was the opposite of what the subject felt. I perceive that this could have caused a struggle between the subject and Freud. For instance, Freud claimed that Dora was aroused by Herr K’s pursuit of her, but was unwilling to acknowledge her desire consciously even after her continuous rejection for the same (Ramas, 1980). Lack of flexibility and unsubstantiated conclusions of Freud might have caused misinterpretations in the outcome of the study. 

Another vast topic covered by Freud in Psychoanalysis was looking at the subject’s sexual desires as desires symbolize the fulfilment of a wish in a distorted way because the consciousness cannot allow the wish to be fulfilled in reality. For instance, Freud believed that Dora’s throat irritation stems from her imagining her father and Frau K. engaging in oral sex. I disagree with Freud when he relates a few symptoms to extremely precise assumptions. 

Also, he came up with the concept of Electra and Oedipus complex but was not sure about the causes of homosexuality. He referred to heterosexuality as “normal”. He said that homosexuality in men was not problematic, lesbianism, however, was a gateway to mental illness (Coffey, 2015). His unreasonable comments on why certain things were considered as a disorder in women and not in men made me question the importance he gave to social and cultural factors. It is well said that the reputation of psychoanalysis is as a conservative cultural force (Safran, 2013). I support this statement as the therapy primarily was generalized by looking at a small sample size of a specific culture and Freud’s findings were valid in their original culture than they were in others (Safran, 2018).  

Although the therapy was not substantiated with a proper explanation, Freud came up with many concepts at the time when the society lacked scientific knowledge. Many treatments of Freud were successful; like the case study of the WolfMan (Kohler, 2014). I believe that taking up the basic principles from Freud, many psychologists have learned through it. In some countries like the United States, massive efforts were made to polish the therapy and to bring up highly qualified therapists (Safran, 2013).

To wrap up, Freud’s psychoanalysis was primarily used to know about the innermost self of the subject. Remarkable concepts were discovered by Freud, however, some unavoidable downsides of his therapy caused the results to be wide of the mark which could severely affect the subject’s mental health. Nevertheless, if the therapy is used comprehensively then it can unquestionably be more efficient.  













References:
Akavia , N. (2005). Hysteria, Identification, and the Family: A Rereading of Freud's Dora Case. Retrieved October 23, 2019, from https://www.jstor.org/stable/26305367?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents

Coffey, R. (2015, December 1). 10 Things About Sigmund Freud You'll Wish You Hadn't Learned. Retrieved October 23, 2019, from https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-bejeezus-out-me/201512/10-things-about-sigmund-freud-youll-wish-you-hadnt-learned

Freud, S., & Bonaparte, P. M. (1954). The origins of psychoanalysis (Vol. 216). London: Imago.

kohler, S. (2014, November 14). Four Suspenseful Stories in Freud's Wolfman Case. Retrieved October 23, 2019, from https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/dreaming-freud/201411/four-suspenseful-stories-in-freuds-wolfman-case


Kunst, J. (2014, January 15). What Is Psychoanalysis? | Psychology Today. Retrieved October 23, 2019, from https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/headshrinkers-guide-the-galaxy/201401/what-is-psychoanalysis

Ramas, M. (1980). Freud's Dora, Dora's Hysteria: The Negation of a Woman's Rebellion. Feminist Studies, 6(3), 472-510. doi:10.2307/3177476 


Safran, J. D. (2013, November 13). Is Freud Still Dead? Retrieved October 23, 2019, from https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/straight-talk/201311/is-freud-still-dead

Safran, J. D. (2018, April 2). Psychoanalysis Today. Retrieved October 23, 2019, from https://www.psychologytoday.com/intl/blog/straight-talk/201804/psychoanalysis-today














Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Hardin's trauma

“After”, is a 2019 teen romantic drama directed by jenny gage that revolves around the love of  Tessa, an inexperienced teenage girl, with Hardin, a mysterious ‘bad boy’ . Hardin, the main male character, never had a secure relationship with his father. When Hardin was young, his father used to be an alcoholic with a lot of debt. When he was just eight years old, intruders broke into his home looking for his father for money, however, there was only Hardin and his mother. The intruders forced themselves on Hardin’s mother, and Hardin, who was sleeping then, came downstairs to see what was wrong. To Hardin’s shock, his mother was being raped by three men, one by one. Hardin’s mother told him to leave, however, one man forced him to watch everything.  I would assume that Hardin has PTSD as a result of this incident, and in this paper I will try to prove it. Symptoms of PTSD and scenes that prove Hardin had it: The person subsequently re-experiences the event through both intrusi...

Analysing “Anniyan”: Dissociative Identity Disorder meets Personality Disorders

Pranaya Prakash In the movie “Anniyan” (Shankar, 2005), the protagonist Ramanujam Iyengar, also known as Ambi, is the host of his alters: Remo and Anniyan. While the focus of the movie is only on Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID), also known as Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD), the host, Ambi, and the alter, Anniyan, show symptoms of Obsessive-Compulsive Personality Disorder (OCPD) and Antisocial Personality Disorder (ASPD), respectively. In this blog post, I attempt to critically analyse the portrayal of DID and the possibility of the protagonist having comorbid Personality Disorders. While it is highly unlikely for individuals with DID to have comorbidities with Personality Disorders ( Antisocial Personality Disorder ), especially with OCPD and ASPD (Fink, 1991), it is interesting to think of the possibility and analyse the developmental trajectory of these individuals.  The movie starts with the character development of Ambi, a lawyer who is meticulous and very particular ...

The Psychological Depth of Good Will Hunting

Shorya Sehgal Good Will Hunting revolves around the interaction of two rebellious characters, Sean Maguire and Will Hunting, who, to a certain extent, help each other to conform slightly. Will is a brilliant but troubled, young adult. He suffers from post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), inferiority complex, defence mechanisms and attachment disorder. A mathematical genius, Will had a complete disrespect for authority and for his own considerable talents. As the story progressed, I was able to see Will’s personal growth as he developed an extremely strong relationship with his therapist, Sean. Sean had fought his own battles in life which had made him tough. This significantly helped Will and Sean to connect to each other on a deep, emotional level. What struck me the most in the movie is how coherently Will's journey is tied together. His transition from an inexpressive, troubled young guy to a mature and responsible one is shown very exquisitely. By the end, he was able to be...