Skip to main content

The Boy Who Was Raised as a Girl

Isha Nagpal


Famous journalist John Colapinto wrote the biography of a man and named the book, “As Nature made him: The Boy Who Was Raised as a Girl”. The book explains the story of baby boy Bruce who was eight months old when he was taken by his parents, along with his twin brother, for a circumcision operation. Some complications arose in Bruce’s operation that led to his penis being permanently affected and the doctors were left with little choice than to remove the penis. This caused a lot of agony among the parents who then went to several specialists to try and understand any possible solutions to this problem. This is when they bumped into a famous psychologist and sexologist at that time, John Money, who suggested to them that the best way to go forward would be to surgically construct a vagina for baby Bruce, to raise him as a girl and to hide the truth about his infancy. Hearing this, the parents agreed to another surgery for the boy in which his testes were surgically removed and a new vulva was fashioned. It was decided that Bruce would now be raised as a girl named Brenda. But all did not go well. (Colapinto, 2000)

This solution did not work as expected. As much as Bruce’s parents tried to impose more feminine ways of living she kept rejecting them more and more. When she reached 13 years of age, Brenda was diagnosed with depression and with advice from her psychiatrist, her parents revealed to her that she was born a boy. Following this, she changed her name from Brenda to David and decided to adopt a male identity. He also went on to get surgeries to reverse the gender reassignment. (Colapinto, 2000) This entire case has been brought to notice several times since then and has always led to the debate about the role of nature v/s nurture when it comes to gender identity. For a long time, psychologists have given nurture the upper hand in this debate. However, these notions have been broken by many psychologists such as Carol Nagy Jacklin and Eleanor Maccoby who wrote a book named, “The Psychology of Sex Differences”, in which they have regarded both biological and social factors as causes for sex differences and have also raised questions on the consistency of these differences. (Maccoby & Jacklin, 1974) These notions were also broken once cases like that of David Reimer were brought into the picture and the harsh consequences of such experiments were seen.

Another such research was one done by Milton Diamond and H. Keith Sigmundson who revisited David Reimer’s case and concluded that, “The evidence seems overwhelming that normal humans are not psychosexually neutral at birth but are, in keeping with their mammalian heritage, predisposed and biased to interact with environmental, familial, and social forces in either a male or female mode”. (Diamond & Sigmundson, 1997) However, we cannot rule out the possibility that the nurture part of our experience influences the way we view ourselves and also might slightly affect our gender identity. This debate does not stop here and as demonstrated in Eagly and Wood’s paper, “The Nature-Nurture Debates: 25 Years of Challenges in Understanding the Psychology of Gender”, this debate has taken many twists and turns without ever reaching a conclusion. (Eagly &Wood, 2013) It has manifested itself in many areas of psychology but gender becomes one of the most crucial areas of this debate. Due to the kind of effect that gender identities have on a person’s upbringing in the present society, it becomes necessary to understand the roles played by both nature and nurture. But unfortunately, there are no right answers when we delve into this area.

This debate has had many disadvantages for many social groups in our society because they have been viewed with suspicion due to our sheer lack of understanding of their struggle. A society which categorizes people into men and women hardly provides space for people who do not comply with either group in terms of their physiology or psychology. With a rapidly growing acknowledgement of diversity in gender identity and a newfound gender-fluidity has opened up more areas of psychological debate which need to be talked about and addressed urgently. 

References
Colapinto, J. (2001). As Nature Made Him: The Boy Who Was Raised as a Girl. New York, NY: Harper Collins.
Maccoby, E. E., & Jacklin, C. N. (1974). The psychology of sex differences. : Stanford University Press.
Diamond, M., & Sigmundson, H. K. (1997). Sex Reassignment at Birth: A Long Term Review and Clinical Implications. Archives Of Paediatric And Adolescent Medicine.
Eagly, A., & Wood, W. (2013). The Nature-Nurture Debates: 25 Years of Challenges in Understanding the Psychology of Gender. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(3), 340-357. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/44289881

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

PTSD and its relationship with defense mechanisms and empathy: Character analysis of Levi Ackerman (SnK)

|Indira Bulhan Blog post: 1 “Manga is for kids” (My ignorant friend, 2018). Manga is often treated by people as something which is not so serious. However, it holds within itself some dark aspects of humanity. One such example is Shingeki no Kyojin (Attack on Titan). In it, the character of Levi Ackerman has been through a series of events which sets him apart from the people around him. Through this blog post, I will look upon the nature of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and its relationship with defense mechanisms and empathy.     Levi’s past is filled with events which can act as strong stressors for the development of trauma: the death of his mother at an early age, abandonment by father, raised by his uncle in the underworld in a highly unhygienic and malnourished state (who later abandons him again), death of his two closest friends and lover. Post-traumatic stress disorder or PTSD can be defined as a mental disorder which can happen to peopl...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is Patrick Jane a psychopath?

Under the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), Psychopathy was never recognized, until the revised DSM-5 categorized it under Anti-Social Personality Disorder. “He will choose you, disarm you with his words, and control you with his presence” (Hare)  Psychopaths can replicate the behavior which the person they are interacting with thinks they want from them, without feeling a thing, which contributes greatly to their ability to manipulate. Psychopaths charm and lie their way seamlessly to the top, and while they lack empathy, they are well-liked because they know what to say and when to say it. Psychopaths occupy most of the positions of power in our society and corporations and thus often end up being glorified. This glorification of psychopaths is most evident in the portrayal of psychopathy in TV shows. Some of the most notable characters which the screen has ever seen, like Marlo Stanfield from ‘The Wire’, James Moriarty from ‘Sherlock’, Hanni...
Post a Comment
Read more

Patrick Bateman: A Successful Psychopath

Abigail D'Souza Personality disorders are psychological disorders characterised by rigid and pervasive patterns of behaviour that persist over time. These must be maladaptive, or cause clinically significant distress to the individual, and are typically recognizable by late adolescence, or early adulthood. The most commonly known personality disorder is Antisocial Personality Disorder (ASPD), or rather Psychopathy, since people often assume the two are synonymous. They aren’t.   ASPD belongs to the Cluster B group of personality disorders, along with Histrionic, Narcissistic, and Borderline personality disorders. Individuals with these tend to be dramatic, emotional, and erratic (Hooley et al., 2021). ASPD is characterised by a lack of moral or ethical development; inability to follow approved models of behaviour; deceitfulness; manipulation of others; history of conduct problems as a child, etc. (Hooley et al., 2021). Psychopathy however, is more a set of traits, like superfi...
Post a Comment
Read more