Skip to main content

Not a Supervillain: Personality Disorders in Joker

 

Miloni Shah

The word most commonly associated with the comic character Joker is madness. Despite being a man who gains pleasure from tricking people, the Joker has been one character with whom the audience sympathises. The latest movie starring Joaquin Phoenix as Joker, uses his mental illnesses to invoke pity from the audience. Joker writes in his diary, “the worst part about having a mental illness is that people expect you to behave as though you don’t.” It is hard to not sympathise with this. The film uses his mental illnesses to explain his madness, making him seem more human than a supervillain. This article analyses the personality disorders that he suffers from based on the DSM V to argue that their depiction is accurate and makes him human but cannot be considered the cause of his violent behaviour. 

Arthur Fleck, who later becomes the Joker, is a lonely party clown who wishes to become a stand-up comedian in Gotham city. He suffers from a medical condition called Pseudobulbar affect which makes him laugh uncontrollably in inappropriate social situations (Skryabin, 2021). He is an awkward man; he does not know how to communicate with people, stares at them, cannot decode normal social cues, and makes odd expressions that make people uncomfortable. For example, he kisses a guest speaker on the Murray show. Her discomfort is apparent. Moreover, his laughter makes a woman on the bus feel irritated and almost disgusted even after he shows her a card that explains his neurological condition, portraying the apathy that exists for people with mental conditions. 

Arthur is doubly ‘troubled’. Not only does he suffer from Pseudobulbar affect but also from two personality disorders, making him seem insane to the common eye. He is narcissistic, evident from the way he craves attention (Skryabin, 2021). He is also psychopathic in that he does not have any empathy for anyone. Though it is not a disorder recognised by the DSM V, psychopathy is considered a personality trait (DeAngelis, 2022). Its closest counterpart recognised by the DSM V is antisocial personality disorder (ASPD). Arthur displays psychopathy as well as hints of ASPD. His violent acts, from murdering the three drunken men on the subway to killing Murray Franklin on live television, are testament to this. 

Though Arthur meets some of the criteria for ASPD, a diagnosis of ASPD cannot be established (Skryabin, 2021). He displays five criteria from group A. Firstly, he does not conform to “lawful or culturally normative ethical behaviour” (American Psychiatric Association, 2013, p. 659). He kills his mother after he discovers that she abused him as a child and had been lying to him about his past. He repeatedly engages in behaviour that is illegal and unethical without paying heed to the consequences. He kills his coworker Randall in cold blood in front of his other coworker Gary. He does not feel remorse for any of his victims, be it Gary or Randall. Even though he lets Gary go without physically harming him, the psychological aggression he inflicts, even on the people who are good to him, shows how his capacity for remorse continues to decline as the film progresses. His remorselessness meets another criterion of the disorder (American Psychiatric Association). Thirdly, his violence is impulsive (American Psychiatric Association). He shoots the television host Murray Franklin. Fourthly, he is irritable and aggressive throughout the film (American Psychiatric Association). This is why he continuously gets involved in physical fights. Lastly, he disregards the safety of himself and others (American Psychiatric Association). Even though he does not mean to harm the sick children he entertains as a clown in the hospital ward, he uses a gun as a prop in front of them. This indicates his inability to grasp the concept of safety.  Additionally, Arthur meets criterion B which states that the individual must be at least 18 years of age (American Psychiatric Association). However, he does not meet criterion C: “evidence of conduct disorder with onset before age 15 years” (American Psychiatric Association, 2013, p. 659). Since there is no information about his childhood, a diagnosis of ASPD (301.7) cannot be made. 

According to the DSM V, Narcissistic Personality Disorder (301.81) is “a pervasive pattern of grandiosity (in fantasy or behaviour), need for admiration, and lack of empathy, beginning by early adulthood and present in a variety of contexts’ characterised by at least five of nine criteria” (American Psychiatric Association, 2013, p. 669). Arthur meets five criteria, enough for a diagnosis of Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD). Firstly, he is “preoccupied with fantasies of unlimited success and ideal love” (American Psychiatric Association, 2013, p. 669). All his life, he has wanted to become a famous stand-up comedian. He imagines himself on television and seeks public attention. He is obsessed with his neighbour Sophie and fantasises about dates with her. Secondly, he needs excessive admiration to function (American Psychiatric Association). Validation from others feeds his self-esteem. When he imagines himself on the show, he expresses his desire for paternal affection. He wants to be told, “I wish I had a son like you.” Thirdly, he feels entitled to favourable treatment from others (American Psychiatric Association). He expects his audience to laugh at his attempts at comedy and gets agitated when this does not happen. He confesses to murdering the three men on the subway and affirms that killing them was funny. Since Murray does not indulge Arthur’s dark humour, he is killed on his own show. Lastly, Arthur lacks empathy (American Psychiatric Association, 2013, p. 670). This is why he cannot tell whether he is making another person feel uncomfortable. Thus, it can be concluded that Arthur has NPD (Skryabin, 2021)

Though accurate in its portrayal of NPD and ASPD, the film must be watched with caution. It perpetuates the idea that mental illnesses cause violent behaviour (Driscoll, 2019). When Arthur stops taking his medication he is depicted as more violent. However, making a causal link between violence and mental disorders is inaccurate (Stuart, 2003). Moreover, it cannot be concluded that all his murders were the consequence of his illnesses. Instead, they were a result of an interaction between his mental state and environment. Income inequality, society’s apathy towards those with mental conditions, and social isolation are important factors that make him more prone to violent behaviour. Finally, the conflation of his neurological condition with his psychological disorders is confusing for the audience. He comes across as an insane clown who cannot control his laughter, reinforcing the stereotype that those with mental disorders are mad. Thus, the depiction of personality disorders is accurate but the overarching theme of violence and mental illnesses should be considered with care. 














References

American Psychiatric Association. (2013). DSM-5 TM. http://repository.poltekkes-kaltim.ac.id/657/1/Diagnostic%20and%20statistical%20manual%20of%20mental%20disorders%20_%20DSM-5%20%28%20PDFDrive.com%20%29.pdf

DeAngelis, T. (2022). A broader view of psychopathy. Apa.org. https://www.apa.org/monitor/2022/03/ce-corner-psychopathy

Driscoll, A. (2019, October 21). Why Joker’s depiction of mental illness is dangerously misinformed. The Guardian; The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/film/2019/oct/21/joker-mental-illness-joaquin-phoenix-dangerous-misinformed

Skryabin, V. Y. (2021). Analysing Joker: an attempt to establish diagnosis for a film icon. BJPsych Bulletin, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjb.2020.146

Stuart, H. (2003). Violence and mental illness: an overview. World Psychiatry : Official Journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA), 2(2), 121–124. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1525086/









Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Burari Deaths: The Psychopathology of Lalit, a Biopsychosocial Perspective

Pankhudi Narayan Blogpost 1  TW: Death, mentions of suicide.         On July 1st of 2018, eleven members of a family were found dead in their shared home in the Burari area of Delhi. The deaths seemed to be fashioned in a ritualistic manner and evidence suggested that the family members were willing participants. This was the Bhatia family, a typical middle-class Indian joint family. Bhopal Singh who had passed away and his wife Narayani Devi formed the older generations of the family and were Lalith’s parents. The most compelling evidence in the uncovering of the events that led to the death of an entire family was provided by eleven diaries found by authorities. The diaries described the events that transpired before the deaths, discussing a ritual that needed to be conducted and the diary entries were corroborated by the post mortem findings as the accounts were found to be consistent with injuries (Yadav et al., 2021). It was uncovered that Lalit, a member of the family who was the

Made in Heaven: An analysis of Faiza Naqvi

Vyoma Vijai Blog Post 3 ‘Made in Heaven’ is a popular Indian web series created by Zoya Akhtar and Reema Kaagti and was launched in March 2018. The show gained a lot of attention in the first few days of it coming out. It is a bold show that focuses on marriage practices in the rich and elite class of Delhi. The show focuses on the social issues and practices that are often not spoken of or are kept closeted. These issues include homosexuality, dowry, molestation and other questionable Indian customs. The story follows the lives of multiple characters at the same time. The two most important characters are Tara and Karan who run a wedding planning agency.   Tara is married to a rich industrialist whose name is Adil and her best friend in the show is Faiza, played by Kalki Koechlin. This essay analyses Faiza’s character and her role in this web series. Faiza is a complex character to understand. Her actions make it hard for the viewers to decide whether they l

Disorderly Delvian: A Deep Dive into "Anna Delvey" through the Lens of NPD

       A markedly thick accent, a mop of blonde hair, a magical array of unimaginably expensive clothing, and an air of calculated mystery mesh uncomfortably together to invent Anna Delvey, the centre of Netflix’s appropriately named documentary/drama series, “Inventing Anna”. This series tells or rather retells the fascinating story of how one woman deceived the creme de la creme of New York society as well as some prestigious financial institutions under the guise that she was a wealthy heiress from Germany. The series follows a journalist, Vivian Kent, as she tries to uncover the carefully constructed web of lies Anna spun around high society after her arrest, heavily interspersed by flashbacks, present-day court hearings, and interviews with the enigma herself (Shondaland, 2022). Anna as a character, infused with a troubling reality and a dramatised narrative, presents an interesting scope to study the symptomatology of Narcissistic Personality Disorder as presented in her behaviou