Skip to main content

Patrick Bateman: A Successful Psychopath

Abigail D'Souza

Personality disorders are psychological disorders characterised by rigid and pervasive patterns of behaviour that persist over time. These must be maladaptive, or cause clinically significant distress to the individual, and are typically recognizable by late adolescence, or early adulthood. The most commonly known personality disorder is Antisocial Personality Disorder (ASPD), or rather Psychopathy, since people often assume the two are synonymous. They aren’t.  

ASPD belongs to the Cluster B group of personality disorders, along with Histrionic, Narcissistic, and Borderline personality disorders. Individuals with these tend to be dramatic, emotional, and erratic (Hooley et al., 2021). ASPD is characterised by a lack of moral or ethical development; inability to follow approved models of behaviour; deceitfulness; manipulation of others; history of conduct problems as a child, etc. (Hooley et al., 2021). Psychopathy however, is more a set of traits, like superficial charm, lack of empathy, and manipulativeness. 

While a diagnosis of ASPD is wider and includes different kinds of criminal behaviours, psychopathy is best characterised by 4 correlated dimensions: interpersonal (superficially charming personality, inflated ego, pathological lying, and manipulation), affective (a lack of guilt and empathy, callousness, and failure to take responsibility for behaviour), lifestyle (constant need for stimulation, irresponsibility, impulsivity, and a lack of foresight), and finally, antisocial (early behavioural problems, delinquency, criminality, etc.). 

It’s unsurprising then, that psychopathy is most featured in horror, and thriller stories. One of the most well-known psychopaths, pop-culturally, is Patrick Bateman, from the film American Psycho. Bateman is an interesting representation of a psychopath— specifically, of a Successful Psychopath. (Mullins-Sweatt et al., 2010, Babiak et al., 2010, Leistedt & Linkowski, 2013). 

Although our knowledge of successful psychopaths is incomplete, they generally display the fundamental traits of a psychopath discussed above, but manage to largely succeed in their exploitation (Mullins-Sweatt et al., 2010). Also called ‘corporate psychopaths’ (Babiak et al., 2010), successful psychopaths are rated highly on the Conscientiousness dimension of the Big Five Personality Test (Mullins-Sweatt et al., 2010).  Additionally, they are rated highly in competence, order, achievement-striving, and self-discipline. 

Patrick Bateman seems a fairly accurate example of the Successful Psychopath. His conscientiousness comes across in his exact, time-consuming daily routine, one of his methods of maintaining his façade. Another example is how he molds his personality to best suit the company he is in— talking about social justice at dinner with his fiancée and their friends, but espousing a view of deep-rooted misogyny when around people he knows think the same. These traits of conscientiousness, order, and self-discipline, help him to get away with his criminal behaviour— they are reflected in, for example, the way he covers up his murder of Paul Allen, how he maintains his ‘mask of sanity,’ etc.

Bateman has also achieved a considerable degree of success. He graduated from Harvard, occupies a prominent, well-paying job at a relatively young age, and lives a life filled with material indicators of status. Where his traits of conscientiousness, order, etc. fail, the privileges his success confer upon him keep him safe, even after he confesses. 

Successful psychopathy cannot be diagnosed without many traits it has in common with general psychopathy, and Bateman displays a majority of these throughout the film. 

Interpersonally, Bateman is very charismatic— people’s opinions of Bateman range from admiration, affection and respect, to the idea that he is boring and even ‘a dork’- but no-one sees in him a threat. Women particularly seem to be drawn to Bateman, even when he is cold or callous with them. His ego is inflated, and he often kills when he perceives himself to be insulted- even when the actual slight is non-existent. We also see Bateman lie easily and often, to Veronica, to Courtney, to Detective Kimball, etc. The most interesting example of Bateman's manipulation skills are the strategies he uses to kill Paul Allen and to try to kill Jean— playing on the former’s egocentricity and the latter’s under-confidence to keep them unawares and in the dark. 

With respect to emotionality, Bateman admits his lack thereof in his opening monologue, saying, "he simply isn’t there," and later, that he feels no emotions but greed and disgust. Indeed, his callousness is clear in his treatment of most other people, as with Evelyn, Jean, and Carruthers, though these are all people who serve no purpose to him, or who already follow him. He is not so dismissive of those he perceives as equal and necessary to maintaining his mask. 

In terms of the ‘lifestyle,’ Bateman is easily bored and constantly chasing stimulation— though sex, drugs, or violence. His impulsivity and irresponsibility are reflected in the unplanned murders he commits, but also in smaller ways, like when he shows Veronica his bloodied sheets, without considering how he might expose himself, or when he uses Allen’s name and apartment, even while his disappearance is being investigated. 

Bateman’s antisocial traits need no elaboration. 

This isn’t to say Bateman is the perfect representation of a successful psychopath, nor his the only experience of successful psychopathy possible. Bateman definitely suffers from psychosis— a possible comorbidity, but not a necessary one. Additionally, the story seems to hint at the possibility of some kind of consciousness, such as when he leaves Evelyn, or encourages Jean to leave his house— by removing them, one might argue he spares them from himself. There are also other personality disorders that serve as models of explanation of Bateman’s behaviour, such as Bipolar, or Narcissistic Personality Disorder, which are likely also comorbid— the similarity of the symptoms of Cluster B Disorders makes it very difficult to separate one from another (Leistedt & Linkowski, 2013). Bateman’s admittance of emptiness and his desire for punishment is also interesting. It might be theoretically inaccurate, or possibly manifestations of Bateman's specific experience.

Finally, the influence of 80s ‘Yuppie’ culture on Bateman’s psychopathy oughtn’t to be discounted (Cooke & Michie, 1999, Hooley et al., 2021, p. 390). Although this analysis has separated Bateman from the metaphor of the movie, it’s a social commentary. Many of Bateman's psychopathic characteristics have been affected and magnified by the society he lives in, and its obsession with wealth, success, status and oneself. 

In conclusion, American Psycho’s Patrick Bateman presents an interesting representation of the successful psychopath, prompting questions about the role of culture, and experiences of distress and emptiness, and perhaps the possibility of non-horror based future representation of ASPD. Regardless, as our understanding of successful psychopaths grows, it will be interesting to see how the movie ‘holds up.’


References:

Babiak, P., Neumann, C. S., & Hare, R. D. (2010). Corporate psychopathy: Talking the walk. Behavioral Sciences & the Law. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.925 

Cooke, D. J., & Michie, C. (1999). Psychopathy across cultures: North America and Scotland compared. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 108(1), 58–68. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.108.1.58 

Henning, J. B., Wygant, D. B., & Barnes, P. W. (2014). Mapping the darkness and finding the light: DSM-5 and assessment of the “corporate psychopath.” Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 7(1), 144–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/iops.12123 

Hooley, J. M., Nock, M. K., & Butcher, J. N. (2021). Abnormal psychology. Pearson Education Limited.

Leistedt, S. J., & Linkowski, P. (2013). Psychopathy and the cinema: Fact or fiction? Journal of Forensic Sciences, 59(1), 167–174. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.12359  

Mathieu, C., Neumann, C. S., Hare, R. D., & Babiak, P. (2014). A dark side of leadership: Corporate psychopathy and its influence on employee well-being and job satisfaction. Personality and Individual Differences, 59, 83–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.11.010 
 
Mullins-Sweatt, S. N., Glover, N. G., Derefinko, K. J., Miller, J. D., & Widiger, T. A. (2010). The search for the successful psychopath. Journal of Research in Personality, 44(4), 554–558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2010.05.010 

Parry, W. (2009). Diagnosing an American Psycho. International Review of Psychiatry, 21(3), 281–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540260902747813  

Walsh, Z., & Kosson, D. S. (2007). Psychopathy and violent crime: A prospective study of the influence of socioeconomic status and ethnicity. Law and Human Behavior, 31(2), 209–229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-006-9057-5  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Burari Deaths: The Psychopathology of Lalit, a Biopsychosocial Perspective

Pankhudi Narayan Blogpost 1  TW: Death, mentions of suicide.         On July 1st of 2018, eleven members of a family were found dead in their shared home in the Burari area of Delhi. The deaths seemed to be fashioned in a ritualistic manner and evidence suggested that the family members were willing participants. This was the Bhatia family, a typical middle-class Indian joint family. Bhopal Singh who had passed away and his wife Narayani Devi formed the older generations of the family and were Lalith’s parents. The most compelling evidence in the uncovering of the events that led to the death of an entire family was provided by eleven diaries found by authorities. The diaries described the events that transpired before the deaths, discussing a ritual that needed to be conducted and the diary entries were corroborated by the post mortem findings as the accounts were found to be consistent with injuries (Yadav et al., 2021). It was uncovered that Lalit, a member of the family who was the

Made in Heaven: An analysis of Faiza Naqvi

Vyoma Vijai Blog Post 3 ‘Made in Heaven’ is a popular Indian web series created by Zoya Akhtar and Reema Kaagti and was launched in March 2018. The show gained a lot of attention in the first few days of it coming out. It is a bold show that focuses on marriage practices in the rich and elite class of Delhi. The show focuses on the social issues and practices that are often not spoken of or are kept closeted. These issues include homosexuality, dowry, molestation and other questionable Indian customs. The story follows the lives of multiple characters at the same time. The two most important characters are Tara and Karan who run a wedding planning agency.   Tara is married to a rich industrialist whose name is Adil and her best friend in the show is Faiza, played by Kalki Koechlin. This essay analyses Faiza’s character and her role in this web series. Faiza is a complex character to understand. Her actions make it hard for the viewers to decide whether they l

Disorderly Delvian: A Deep Dive into "Anna Delvey" through the Lens of NPD

       A markedly thick accent, a mop of blonde hair, a magical array of unimaginably expensive clothing, and an air of calculated mystery mesh uncomfortably together to invent Anna Delvey, the centre of Netflix’s appropriately named documentary/drama series, “Inventing Anna”. This series tells or rather retells the fascinating story of how one woman deceived the creme de la creme of New York society as well as some prestigious financial institutions under the guise that she was a wealthy heiress from Germany. The series follows a journalist, Vivian Kent, as she tries to uncover the carefully constructed web of lies Anna spun around high society after her arrest, heavily interspersed by flashbacks, present-day court hearings, and interviews with the enigma herself (Shondaland, 2022). Anna as a character, infused with a troubling reality and a dramatised narrative, presents an interesting scope to study the symptomatology of Narcissistic Personality Disorder as presented in her behaviou