Skip to main content

The Curious Case of Teddy Daniels – An analysis of Schizophrenia in Shutter Island

 Snigdhaa Rajvanshi 

Released in 2010, Shutter Island, starring Leonardo DiCaprio, Mark Ruffalo and Ben Kingsley is one of the most well-known portrayals of Schizophrenia in popular media. Along with starring celebrated actors, the movie also provides a suspenseful thriller that is enough to keep the viewers guessing till the conclusion of the movie. However, while the movie is a great source of Hollywood-like entertainment, many have wondered if it is a reasonably accurate representation of people suffering with Schizophrenia or just a gross dramatization of the disorder. Since the movie is extremely popular, it plays an important part in forming the audiences’ perception of the disorder and subsequent reactions. This blog aims to analyze the protagonist of the story – Teddy Daniels and determine if his presentation of schizophrenia was portrayed accurately on-screen, or if, his symptoms resembled schizophrenia at all. While doing so, this blog also expects to highlight the possible impact the movie may have had on its audience, both positive and negative.

In the movie, Teddy Daniels, a US Marshall, is assigned to investigate the seemingly impossible disappearance of Rachel Solando- a patient at Ashecliffe Asylum along with his partner Chuck Aule. As the story progresses, it is revealed that Teddy was himself a patient of the asylum who was admitted two years ago on the charges of killing his wife after she drowned their three children in a lake. According to the Diathesis-Stress model, stress can trigger psychosis if the person has a genetic predisposition to schizophrenia (Hooley et al., 2021). Throughout the length of the story, Ted is shown to have flashbacks and nightmares about the time he served in the army against Germany in Dachau during world war 2. It can be safely argued that the traumatic stress from Ted’s time in Germany and the bloody death of his family can be the two possible instances that triggered Ted’s psychosis. While Ted is not shown to abuse cannabis, which is proven to be highly correlated with Schizophrenia, he is shown to be an alcoholic and a chain smoker. While alcoholism and smoking are not contributors to schizophrenia, the movie does a spectacular job of highlighting the comorbidity of disorders where Ted showcases symptoms of schizophrenia and substance abuse and possible PTSD.

The movie highlights the two most popular symptoms of schizophrenia- delusions, and hallucinations. Ted, imagining himself to be a respected US Marshall, imagines himself to be the center of the conspiracy that was going on in Ashecliffe. He is convinced that it is his responsibility to expose the doctors at the asylum and then is later convinced that he is alone and that the people at Ashecliffe are after him, drugging him and isolating him from the rest of the world so that they can perform an experimental transorbital lobotomy on him. It can be very clearly seen that Ted suffers from delusions of grandeur and persecution along with paranoia. Ted is also shown to experience both visual and auditory hallucinations. His hallucinations manifest themselves in relation to his past traumas. His primary hallucinations include his wife, Dolores Chanal, a little girl (who is later revealed to be his dead daughter), and the runaway patient, Rachel Solando (named after his daughter). He also creates fictional characters that add to this fictional world including the janitor was set fire to the apartment that killed Ted’s wife in his fictional world- Andrew Laddeis. Laddeis is then revealed to be the actual identity of Teddy himself as it is rationalized as the creation of a separate identity named Teddy Daniels in order to escape from accepting the reality where he killed his wife. His hallucinations feed into his delusions. His wife, in many instances, informs him of the presence of Andrew Laddeis, her killer, in the asylum as the 67th patient. Rachel Solando, with whom he interacted in a cave, confirms all his delusions about the conspiracy at Achecliffe and informs him that he “has no friends” when asked about the disappearance of his partner, Chuck. The DSM V (Hooley et al., 2021) lists five important symptoms in Criterion A for a diagnosis of schizophrenia- Delusions, Hallucinations, Disorganised behavior and/or speech, and negative symptoms (like diminished emotional expression or avolition) experienced over at least six months. Interestingly, Ted fails to showcase any disorganized behavior including catatonia, disturbed everyday functioning, or any negative symptoms. While instances of aggression and disregard for self-safety are shown at various points of the movie (he climbs down a hill in order to save his partner), Ted’s character fails to showcase any failed regard to maintain personal hygiene, diminished emotional response (his interactions with his wife) or lack of motivation (he was extremely motivated to find Rachel Solando).

While schizophrenic delusions are often isolated beliefs, they can also sometimes “become elaborated into a complex delusional system." (Hooley et al., 2021) as was the case with Teddy. Hallucinations also “often have relevance for the patient at some affective, conceptual, or behavioral level. Patients can become emotionally involved in their hallucinations, often incorporating them into their delusions.” (Hooley et al., 2021) which explains the basis of Teddy’s hallucinations in his traumatic past and his attempts to escape from the same. Moreover, in some cases,” patients may even act on their hallucinations and do what the voices tell them to do" (Hooley et al., 2021) rationalizing Teddy’s compliance with his wife and Rachel Solando. However, the absence of any other characteristic symptoms of schizophrenia, although does not rule out the diagnosis, also opens the door to other possible diagnoses.

Delusional Disorder is characterized by the presence of delusions (and possible non-prominent hallucinations) without the “gross disorganization and performance deficiencies characteristic of schizophrenia” (Hooley et al., 2021). Dr. Alistair Munro, author of Delusional Disorder: Paranoia and other related illnesses (2006) states, that otherwise showing normal emotion, patients with delusional disorder tense up and can be made angry very easily. This explains Ted’s reaction to the conversation around violence and defense mechanisms with the head psychiatrist of the asylum. It can be argued that the conversation reminded him of the violence that he witnessed (and partook in) in Dachau and the violent end to his family. However, it is important to take into consideration that the hallucination frequency and intensity in delusional disorder are considerably less (or even non-existent) than in schizophrenia (Muñoz-Negro et al., 2017). Therefore, Teddy’s case becomes interesting as it cannot be conclusively be termed as either schizophrenia (absence of disorganized behavior) or delusional disorder (high intensity of hallucinations).

Although it would be unrealistic to expect an extremely accurate representation of mental disorders from a commercial movie, Shutter Island, while dramatizing the disorder, does a relatively good job at portraying a possible schizophrenic. However, their focus on the delusions and hallucinations of the protagonist while completely disregarding all the other symptoms of the disorder opens the way for an argument in favor of delusional disorder. This can prove to be dangerous as the movie overshadows a possible delusional disorder, which is anyway a lesser-known form of psychotic disorder, by schizophrenia leading to a distorted image of both delusional disorder and schizophrenia in the audiences’ perception. Despite that, the movie has other positives. Teddy’s wife is described to be a suicidal bipolar, a diagnosis that ultimately led her to burn their apartment in the city and drown her three children. The movie highlights the struggles of the family members living with a person diagnosed with mental illness and the consequences of the associated ignorance. Teddy accepts that it was his fault that he did not get his wife the help she needed after she confided in him with her struggles. His avoidance led to the death of his children and wife and Teddy’s subsequent psychosis. While the movie portrayal of schizophrenia cannot be termed entirely accurate, Teddy Daniels or Andrew Laddeis still is a good, thriller-induced, Hollywood-esque introduction into the world of schizophrenia. Although this famous movie has possible negative effects, an argument in the favour of its positive public impact can able to viably made.

 

 

 References

Hooley, J. M., Nock, M., & James Neal Butcher. (2021). Abnormal psychology. Pearson.

Muñoz-Negro, J. E., Ibáñez-Casas, I., de Portugal, E., Lozano-Gutiérrez, V., Martínez-Leal, R., & Cervilla, J. A. (2017). A Psychopathological Comparison between Delusional Disorder and Schizophrenia. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 63(1), 12–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0706743717706347

Munro, A. (2006). Delusional disorder: paranoia and related illnesses. Cambridge University Press.

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Burari Deaths: The Psychopathology of Lalit, a Biopsychosocial Perspective

Pankhudi Narayan Blogpost 1  TW: Death, mentions of suicide.         On July 1st of 2018, eleven members of a family were found dead in their shared home in the Burari area of Delhi. The deaths seemed to be fashioned in a ritualistic manner and evidence suggested that the family members were willing participants. This was the Bhatia family, a typical middle-class Indian joint family. Bhopal Singh who had passed away and his wife Narayani Devi formed the older generations of the family and were Lalith’s parents. The most compelling evidence in the uncovering of the events that led to the death of an entire family was provided by eleven diaries found by authorities. The diaries described the events that transpired before the deaths, discussing a ritual that needed to be conducted and the diary entries were corroborated by the post mortem findings as the accounts were found to be consistent with injuries (Yadav et al., 2021). It was uncovered that Lalit, a member of the family who was the

Made in Heaven: An analysis of Faiza Naqvi

Vyoma Vijai Blog Post 3 ‘Made in Heaven’ is a popular Indian web series created by Zoya Akhtar and Reema Kaagti and was launched in March 2018. The show gained a lot of attention in the first few days of it coming out. It is a bold show that focuses on marriage practices in the rich and elite class of Delhi. The show focuses on the social issues and practices that are often not spoken of or are kept closeted. These issues include homosexuality, dowry, molestation and other questionable Indian customs. The story follows the lives of multiple characters at the same time. The two most important characters are Tara and Karan who run a wedding planning agency.   Tara is married to a rich industrialist whose name is Adil and her best friend in the show is Faiza, played by Kalki Koechlin. This essay analyses Faiza’s character and her role in this web series. Faiza is a complex character to understand. Her actions make it hard for the viewers to decide whether they l

Disorderly Delvian: A Deep Dive into "Anna Delvey" through the Lens of NPD

       A markedly thick accent, a mop of blonde hair, a magical array of unimaginably expensive clothing, and an air of calculated mystery mesh uncomfortably together to invent Anna Delvey, the centre of Netflix’s appropriately named documentary/drama series, “Inventing Anna”. This series tells or rather retells the fascinating story of how one woman deceived the creme de la creme of New York society as well as some prestigious financial institutions under the guise that she was a wealthy heiress from Germany. The series follows a journalist, Vivian Kent, as she tries to uncover the carefully constructed web of lies Anna spun around high society after her arrest, heavily interspersed by flashbacks, present-day court hearings, and interviews with the enigma herself (Shondaland, 2022). Anna as a character, infused with a troubling reality and a dramatised narrative, presents an interesting scope to study the symptomatology of Narcissistic Personality Disorder as presented in her behaviou