Skip to main content

Maniac: Emma Stone and Jonah Hill Killed it. Here's How.

Anandita Lidhoo

The controversial Netflix show, Maniac, stars Emma Stone and Jonah Hill in a retrofuturistic dystopia, where a few suffering from psychological trauma apply as test subjects for an experimental pharmaceutical trial. By the end of this experiment, they are promised “pure, unaffected joy,” as the medication (a set of three pills) is supposed to replace years of cognitive-behavioural therapy.
The show imbibes a lot of the current approaches and theories in the realm of clinical psychology, with a fantastical twist to them. It keeps the viewers hooked with its quickly shifting sense of time, space, and normalcy. The potrayal of mental illnesses in the show is very accurate- be it from small behaviours like how the protagonists carry themselves in public to how they behave in the drug-fueled hallucinations they have in the pharmaceutical trials.
The interviewer, Dr Mantleray, debriefs them in front of a few cameras to verify the data captured by a supercomputer he created, colloquially called “Gertie.” A lot of the way he questions the participants of the study resembles the gentle nudges given by present-day therapists, allowing viewers to connect this aspect of the show to reality.
The treatment Stone and Hill sign up for revolves around three pills- A, B, and C. Each comes with its own characteristic effect- and yet all have a common procedure. You take the pill, swallow, close your eyes, and let the mind hallucinate while Gertie captures it all. Pill A forces you to relive your trauma (specifically the most traumatic incidents you have had), Pill B makes you see your blind spots, and Pill C forces you to have a confrontation. This procedure is quite similar to what happens with patients in therapy, and how they first are made to process their trauma, then discuss their personality traits and blind spots, and ultimately, confront themselves and others involved in the trauma. Additionally, since in the show, the procedure happens entirely in the brain, it makes it all much more elegant and sophisticated, ensuring no external damage and much more mental freedom.
The show has taken an interesting perspective on mental illness and living with it, day-to-day. It shows the banality and the extremes, both without romanticising them. It sheds light on the yearning for being “normal” and wanting to do anything to be this way- something that is present in our current society. The show makes one question what normal is, however, trying to make the viewers realise that this pointless, endless chase towards “being healed” is nothing but, if only to fit in society’s standards of mentally healthy.
Anne (Stone)’s addiction to the A pill to self-medicate her depression is a classic example of the aforementioned. Many feel so stigmatised and unable to reach out for help that they rely on unhealthy and toxic ways to cope- be it drugs, alcohol, or putting oneself in danger. She has little to no money to feed herself, she is behind on rent and has no job, because she only gathers enough money to ‘score’ A and snort it, since that is all she cares about. This obsession with feeling better, avoiding the depression, every single day, is very relatable for many in our current society.
Another beautiful aspect of the show is that the scientists running the tests are just as “problematic” as the participants of the trial. Dr Muramoto dies because he was freebasing a mix of A and C, potentially avoiding his own trauma. Dr Mantleray has evident “mommy” issues and is paraphilic, while Dr Fujita refuses to step out, chain-smokes, and is possibly agoraphobic. All three scientists dealt with their psychological anguish in their own, characteristic ways, exhorting the viewers to question what normal and successful is. The power dynamics of such a setting are interesting as both sides of the coin feel the same way, they may even share coping mechanisms. This shatters the belief that those with mental illness cannot lead a “normal” life.

An eye-opener, Maniac is a must-watch for its accurate and yet futuristic take on mental health, its perception, and normalcy.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Scarlett O' Hara Diagnosed

By Ragini Chatterjee   (Overall Grade Remedial) A case study on Scarlett O' Hara from ‘Gone with The Wind’   Scarlett O' Hara has to be one of the most vivacious character, on print. With her southern Belle ‘ Fiddle de dees ’, bright green eyes and sharp tongue, she is hard to forget. After having seen the movie multiple times from age 13, I was fascinated by her personality. Her antics, at times cruel, bought the story to life. Her obsession with Ashley, her multiple marriages, her cunning mind and relentless spirt were always entertaining from the perspective of the viewer. However, years later as I look back, I can’t help but recognize patterns of behavior that may resonate with some personality disorder. From the beginning of the movie, Scarlett has to be the centre of attention . At the Wilkes Party, in her attempts to drive Ashley jealous, she flirts with every man in sight- Starting with Charles Hamilton, Frank Kennedy, the Tarleton twins, she promis...

PTSD and its portrayal in Peaky Blinders

AARYAN SANWAL The award-winning TV series, Peaky Blinders is set in Birmingham, England at the end of the First World War and gives an account of the Peaky Blinders that is headed by the Shelby family. Thomas Shelby was a tunneller in World War I and for his actions, received two medals of honour after the war.   This blog post shall look at the representation of war trauma, its accuracy in depictions and its effects on the lives of the characters. The two main characters that this blog post will be focusing on are Thomas Shelby and Daniel Owen (a.k.a. Danny Whiz-Bang). The two of them were tunnellers in the War and were going through a routine tunnel expedition when the Germans broke through the end of their tunnel and attacked the men in the tunnel and brutally injured Thomas and Daniel. They were able to kill the enemies and leave the tunnels, alive but severely injured. During various instances throughout the show, Thomas Shelby has recurring nightmares of his time i...

Is Patrick Jane a psychopath?

Under the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), Psychopathy was never recognized, until the revised DSM-5 categorized it under Anti-Social Personality Disorder. “He will choose you, disarm you with his words, and control you with his presence” (Hare)  Psychopaths can replicate the behavior which the person they are interacting with thinks they want from them, without feeling a thing, which contributes greatly to their ability to manipulate. Psychopaths charm and lie their way seamlessly to the top, and while they lack empathy, they are well-liked because they know what to say and when to say it. Psychopaths occupy most of the positions of power in our society and corporations and thus often end up being glorified. This glorification of psychopaths is most evident in the portrayal of psychopathy in TV shows. Some of the most notable characters which the screen has ever seen, like Marlo Stanfield from ‘The Wire’, James Moriarty from ‘Sherlock’, Hanni...