Skip to main content

Maniac: Emma Stone and Jonah Hill Killed it. Here's How.

Anandita Lidhoo

The controversial Netflix show, Maniac, stars Emma Stone and Jonah Hill in a retrofuturistic dystopia, where a few suffering from psychological trauma apply as test subjects for an experimental pharmaceutical trial. By the end of this experiment, they are promised “pure, unaffected joy,” as the medication (a set of three pills) is supposed to replace years of cognitive-behavioural therapy.
The show imbibes a lot of the current approaches and theories in the realm of clinical psychology, with a fantastical twist to them. It keeps the viewers hooked with its quickly shifting sense of time, space, and normalcy. The potrayal of mental illnesses in the show is very accurate- be it from small behaviours like how the protagonists carry themselves in public to how they behave in the drug-fueled hallucinations they have in the pharmaceutical trials.
The interviewer, Dr Mantleray, debriefs them in front of a few cameras to verify the data captured by a supercomputer he created, colloquially called “Gertie.” A lot of the way he questions the participants of the study resembles the gentle nudges given by present-day therapists, allowing viewers to connect this aspect of the show to reality.
The treatment Stone and Hill sign up for revolves around three pills- A, B, and C. Each comes with its own characteristic effect- and yet all have a common procedure. You take the pill, swallow, close your eyes, and let the mind hallucinate while Gertie captures it all. Pill A forces you to relive your trauma (specifically the most traumatic incidents you have had), Pill B makes you see your blind spots, and Pill C forces you to have a confrontation. This procedure is quite similar to what happens with patients in therapy, and how they first are made to process their trauma, then discuss their personality traits and blind spots, and ultimately, confront themselves and others involved in the trauma. Additionally, since in the show, the procedure happens entirely in the brain, it makes it all much more elegant and sophisticated, ensuring no external damage and much more mental freedom.
The show has taken an interesting perspective on mental illness and living with it, day-to-day. It shows the banality and the extremes, both without romanticising them. It sheds light on the yearning for being “normal” and wanting to do anything to be this way- something that is present in our current society. The show makes one question what normal is, however, trying to make the viewers realise that this pointless, endless chase towards “being healed” is nothing but, if only to fit in society’s standards of mentally healthy.
Anne (Stone)’s addiction to the A pill to self-medicate her depression is a classic example of the aforementioned. Many feel so stigmatised and unable to reach out for help that they rely on unhealthy and toxic ways to cope- be it drugs, alcohol, or putting oneself in danger. She has little to no money to feed herself, she is behind on rent and has no job, because she only gathers enough money to ‘score’ A and snort it, since that is all she cares about. This obsession with feeling better, avoiding the depression, every single day, is very relatable for many in our current society.
Another beautiful aspect of the show is that the scientists running the tests are just as “problematic” as the participants of the trial. Dr Muramoto dies because he was freebasing a mix of A and C, potentially avoiding his own trauma. Dr Mantleray has evident “mommy” issues and is paraphilic, while Dr Fujita refuses to step out, chain-smokes, and is possibly agoraphobic. All three scientists dealt with their psychological anguish in their own, characteristic ways, exhorting the viewers to question what normal and successful is. The power dynamics of such a setting are interesting as both sides of the coin feel the same way, they may even share coping mechanisms. This shatters the belief that those with mental illness cannot lead a “normal” life.

An eye-opener, Maniac is a must-watch for its accurate and yet futuristic take on mental health, its perception, and normalcy.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Burari Deaths: The Psychopathology of Lalit, a Biopsychosocial Perspective

Pankhudi Narayan Blogpost 1  TW: Death, mentions of suicide.         On July 1st of 2018, eleven members of a family were found dead in their shared home in the Burari area of Delhi. The deaths seemed to be fashioned in a ritualistic manner and evidence suggested that the family members were willing participants. This was the Bhatia family, a typical middle-class Indian joint family. Bhopal Singh who had passed away and his wife Narayani Devi formed the older generations of the family and were Lalith’s parents. The most compelling evidence in the uncovering of the events that led to the death of an entire family was provided by eleven diaries found by authorities. The diaries described the events that transpired before the deaths, discussing a ritual that needed to be conducted and the diary entries were corroborated by the post mortem findings as the accounts were found to be consistent with injuries (Yadav et al., 2021). It was uncovered that Lalit, a member of the family who was the

Made in Heaven: An analysis of Faiza Naqvi

Vyoma Vijai Blog Post 3 ‘Made in Heaven’ is a popular Indian web series created by Zoya Akhtar and Reema Kaagti and was launched in March 2018. The show gained a lot of attention in the first few days of it coming out. It is a bold show that focuses on marriage practices in the rich and elite class of Delhi. The show focuses on the social issues and practices that are often not spoken of or are kept closeted. These issues include homosexuality, dowry, molestation and other questionable Indian customs. The story follows the lives of multiple characters at the same time. The two most important characters are Tara and Karan who run a wedding planning agency.   Tara is married to a rich industrialist whose name is Adil and her best friend in the show is Faiza, played by Kalki Koechlin. This essay analyses Faiza’s character and her role in this web series. Faiza is a complex character to understand. Her actions make it hard for the viewers to decide whether they l

Disorderly Delvian: A Deep Dive into "Anna Delvey" through the Lens of NPD

       A markedly thick accent, a mop of blonde hair, a magical array of unimaginably expensive clothing, and an air of calculated mystery mesh uncomfortably together to invent Anna Delvey, the centre of Netflix’s appropriately named documentary/drama series, “Inventing Anna”. This series tells or rather retells the fascinating story of how one woman deceived the creme de la creme of New York society as well as some prestigious financial institutions under the guise that she was a wealthy heiress from Germany. The series follows a journalist, Vivian Kent, as she tries to uncover the carefully constructed web of lies Anna spun around high society after her arrest, heavily interspersed by flashbacks, present-day court hearings, and interviews with the enigma herself (Shondaland, 2022). Anna as a character, infused with a troubling reality and a dramatised narrative, presents an interesting scope to study the symptomatology of Narcissistic Personality Disorder as presented in her behaviou