Skip to main content

Euthanasia and Alzheimer’s: What does ‘saving’ a loved one really mean?

Moksha Pasricha

Remedial Blog post for quiz 10

Euthanasia and Alzheimer’s: What does ‘saving’ a loved one really mean?

            What to do when a loved one is diagnosed with Alzheimer’s is a classic philosophical and ethical dilemma. The prognosis of a person with Alzheimer’s, diagnosed after 65, is about four to eight years. These four to eight years, are filled with loss in memory, loss in sense of self, loss in perceptual and motor function, etc. A person with Alzheimer’s – depending on the speed of advancement and age of onset – ultimately leads to loss of mind and bodily functions.

 Often times, and even with my own grandmother who had Alzheimer’s, we hear family members and close relatives, talk about who the person, who has now reduced to be just a patient of Alzheimer’s, once was. My grandmother – was an ambassador’s wife, with pride as her highest identifier. She was a woman of her word, of class and grace. 5 years into the disease, she lived at her son’s house, was bathed and dressed by a nurse every day and couldn’t even talk enough to ask for a glass of water.

My parents, me and my sister who assisted the nurse in caring for my grandmother, loved my grandmother immensely. However, she just wasn’t my grandmother anymore. My parents were often heard reminiscing about old times, when my grandmother was the head of the household, they often talked about how she would have hated this life of dependence and helplessness. The love and attachment we all had for my grandmother, possibly clouded our judgement in what she would have wanted, and my parents kept up the extraordinary measures in keeping her alive. It was then arguably, selfish and inconsiderate to put her through that sort of life.

In such situations, of Alzheimer’s after the loss of what we posit to be the essence of a person, their memories and experiences and their agency, when one is stripped of who they are and what they can do – would anyone really want such a life? In March this year, the supreme court passed a judgement which stated that “The right to die with dignity is a fundamental right.” The supreme court has passed a judgement legalizing passive euthanasia in India. Passive euthanasia takes place when there is a withdrawal of medical care to hasten death. It is, therefore, a death brought about by absence or omission of medical care.  An important point to note, however, is that there is a requirement of consent from the individual who wishes to undergo such passive euthanasia and stop their medical treatment.

This clause in the judgement fails to account for those who do not have the agency or mental ability to decide for themselves. Understandably there is a need for checks and rules so as to manage misuse of this law, but there is a necessity to take in to consideration the need for this law in regard to persons who have any form of dementia.  A person with Alzheimer’s is not considered medically fit to take any such decision. Who must then take the onus, and be allowed to take the onus, to decide the trajectory of such a person’s end of life care?


In conclusion, while the law allowing passive euthanasia is a step forward to helping the terminally ill, there needs to be consideration for persons who have lost their agency and a system needs to be formed to help relieve them. There needs to be discourse on how to take steps in this direction while ensuring there is no misconduct, and no one takes undue advantage of terminally ill patients. We also need to consider whether we are truly saving people by increasing their life expectancy without taking their quality of life in to consideration. We must decipher whether ‘Saving’ someone is just keeping them from physically not dying , relieving them from pain, or allowing them to live happily?

References:
https://www.psychologytoday.com/intl/blog/patient-power/201509/my-dad-deserves-die
https://thewire.in/health/passive-euthanasia-now-a-legal-reality-in-india
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Analysing “Anniyan”: Dissociative Identity Disorder meets Personality Disorders

Pranaya Prakash In the movie “Anniyan” (Shankar, 2005), the protagonist Ramanujam Iyengar, also known as Ambi, is the host of his alters: Remo and Anniyan. While the focus of the movie is only on Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID), also known as Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD), the host, Ambi, and the alter, Anniyan, show symptoms of Obsessive-Compulsive Personality Disorder (OCPD) and Antisocial Personality Disorder (ASPD), respectively. In this blog post, I attempt to critically analyse the portrayal of DID and the possibility of the protagonist having comorbid Personality Disorders. While it is highly unlikely for individuals with DID to have comorbidities with Personality Disorders ( Antisocial Personality Disorder ), especially with OCPD and ASPD (Fink, 1991), it is interesting to think of the possibility and analyse the developmental trajectory of these individuals.  The movie starts with the character development of Ambi, a lawyer who is meticulous and very particular ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Hardin's trauma

“After”, is a 2019 teen romantic drama directed by jenny gage that revolves around the love of  Tessa, an inexperienced teenage girl, with Hardin, a mysterious ‘bad boy’ . Hardin, the main male character, never had a secure relationship with his father. When Hardin was young, his father used to be an alcoholic with a lot of debt. When he was just eight years old, intruders broke into his home looking for his father for money, however, there was only Hardin and his mother. The intruders forced themselves on Hardin’s mother, and Hardin, who was sleeping then, came downstairs to see what was wrong. To Hardin’s shock, his mother was being raped by three men, one by one. Hardin’s mother told him to leave, however, one man forced him to watch everything.  I would assume that Hardin has PTSD as a result of this incident, and in this paper I will try to prove it. Symptoms of PTSD and scenes that prove Hardin had it: The person subsequently re-experiences the event through both intrusi...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is Patrick Jane a psychopath?

Under the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), Psychopathy was never recognized, until the revised DSM-5 categorized it under Anti-Social Personality Disorder. “He will choose you, disarm you with his words, and control you with his presence” (Hare)  Psychopaths can replicate the behavior which the person they are interacting with thinks they want from them, without feeling a thing, which contributes greatly to their ability to manipulate. Psychopaths charm and lie their way seamlessly to the top, and while they lack empathy, they are well-liked because they know what to say and when to say it. Psychopaths occupy most of the positions of power in our society and corporations and thus often end up being glorified. This glorification of psychopaths is most evident in the portrayal of psychopathy in TV shows. Some of the most notable characters which the screen has ever seen, like Marlo Stanfield from ‘The Wire’, James Moriarty from ‘Sherlock’, Hanni...
Post a Comment
Read more