Skip to main content

Euthanasia and Alzheimer’s: What does ‘saving’ a loved one really mean?

Moksha Pasricha

Remedial Blog post for quiz 10

Euthanasia and Alzheimer’s: What does ‘saving’ a loved one really mean?

            What to do when a loved one is diagnosed with Alzheimer’s is a classic philosophical and ethical dilemma. The prognosis of a person with Alzheimer’s, diagnosed after 65, is about four to eight years. These four to eight years, are filled with loss in memory, loss in sense of self, loss in perceptual and motor function, etc. A person with Alzheimer’s – depending on the speed of advancement and age of onset – ultimately leads to loss of mind and bodily functions.

 Often times, and even with my own grandmother who had Alzheimer’s, we hear family members and close relatives, talk about who the person, who has now reduced to be just a patient of Alzheimer’s, once was. My grandmother – was an ambassador’s wife, with pride as her highest identifier. She was a woman of her word, of class and grace. 5 years into the disease, she lived at her son’s house, was bathed and dressed by a nurse every day and couldn’t even talk enough to ask for a glass of water.

My parents, me and my sister who assisted the nurse in caring for my grandmother, loved my grandmother immensely. However, she just wasn’t my grandmother anymore. My parents were often heard reminiscing about old times, when my grandmother was the head of the household, they often talked about how she would have hated this life of dependence and helplessness. The love and attachment we all had for my grandmother, possibly clouded our judgement in what she would have wanted, and my parents kept up the extraordinary measures in keeping her alive. It was then arguably, selfish and inconsiderate to put her through that sort of life.

In such situations, of Alzheimer’s after the loss of what we posit to be the essence of a person, their memories and experiences and their agency, when one is stripped of who they are and what they can do – would anyone really want such a life? In March this year, the supreme court passed a judgement which stated that “The right to die with dignity is a fundamental right.” The supreme court has passed a judgement legalizing passive euthanasia in India. Passive euthanasia takes place when there is a withdrawal of medical care to hasten death. It is, therefore, a death brought about by absence or omission of medical care.  An important point to note, however, is that there is a requirement of consent from the individual who wishes to undergo such passive euthanasia and stop their medical treatment.

This clause in the judgement fails to account for those who do not have the agency or mental ability to decide for themselves. Understandably there is a need for checks and rules so as to manage misuse of this law, but there is a necessity to take in to consideration the need for this law in regard to persons who have any form of dementia.  A person with Alzheimer’s is not considered medically fit to take any such decision. Who must then take the onus, and be allowed to take the onus, to decide the trajectory of such a person’s end of life care?


In conclusion, while the law allowing passive euthanasia is a step forward to helping the terminally ill, there needs to be consideration for persons who have lost their agency and a system needs to be formed to help relieve them. There needs to be discourse on how to take steps in this direction while ensuring there is no misconduct, and no one takes undue advantage of terminally ill patients. We also need to consider whether we are truly saving people by increasing their life expectancy without taking their quality of life in to consideration. We must decipher whether ‘Saving’ someone is just keeping them from physically not dying , relieving them from pain, or allowing them to live happily?

References:
https://www.psychologytoday.com/intl/blog/patient-power/201509/my-dad-deserves-die
https://thewire.in/health/passive-euthanasia-now-a-legal-reality-in-india

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Hardin's trauma

“After”, is a 2019 teen romantic drama directed by jenny gage that revolves around the love of  Tessa, an inexperienced teenage girl, with Hardin, a mysterious ‘bad boy’ . Hardin, the main male character, never had a secure relationship with his father. When Hardin was young, his father used to be an alcoholic with a lot of debt. When he was just eight years old, intruders broke into his home looking for his father for money, however, there was only Hardin and his mother. The intruders forced themselves on Hardin’s mother, and Hardin, who was sleeping then, came downstairs to see what was wrong. To Hardin’s shock, his mother was being raped by three men, one by one. Hardin’s mother told him to leave, however, one man forced him to watch everything.  I would assume that Hardin has PTSD as a result of this incident, and in this paper I will try to prove it. Symptoms of PTSD and scenes that prove Hardin had it: The person subsequently re-experiences the event through both intrusive memori

Disorderly Delvian: A Deep Dive into "Anna Delvey" through the Lens of NPD

       A markedly thick accent, a mop of blonde hair, a magical array of unimaginably expensive clothing, and an air of calculated mystery mesh uncomfortably together to invent Anna Delvey, the centre of Netflix’s appropriately named documentary/drama series, “Inventing Anna”. This series tells or rather retells the fascinating story of how one woman deceived the creme de la creme of New York society as well as some prestigious financial institutions under the guise that she was a wealthy heiress from Germany. The series follows a journalist, Vivian Kent, as she tries to uncover the carefully constructed web of lies Anna spun around high society after her arrest, heavily interspersed by flashbacks, present-day court hearings, and interviews with the enigma herself (Shondaland, 2022). Anna as a character, infused with a troubling reality and a dramatised narrative, presents an interesting scope to study the symptomatology of Narcissistic Personality Disorder as presented in her behaviou

The Psychological Depth of Good Will Hunting

Shorya Sehgal Good Will Hunting revolves around the interaction of two rebellious characters, Sean Maguire and Will Hunting, who, to a certain extent, help each other to conform slightly. Will is a brilliant but troubled, young adult. He suffers from post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), inferiority complex, defence mechanisms and attachment disorder. A mathematical genius, Will had a complete disrespect for authority and for his own considerable talents. As the story progressed, I was able to see Will’s personal growth as he developed an extremely strong relationship with his therapist, Sean. Sean had fought his own battles in life which had made him tough. This significantly helped Will and Sean to connect to each other on a deep, emotional level. What struck me the most in the movie is how coherently Will's journey is tied together. His transition from an inexpressive, troubled young guy to a mature and responsible one is shown very exquisitely. By the end, he was able to be