Skip to main content

Responce to the blog 'Why a Show “Discouraging” Suicide Caused Suicides"


siddhu

for the final overall grade


While I agree to most the arguments, I do have a differing view to a few mentioned in the article.

The article is correct in mentioning that in the clutter of TV programs, movies, social media, everyone and especially content creators are fighting a battle for views. Hence, there is a huge pressure for any new show to create a ‘shock value’ to gain high viewership. ‘13 reason why’ was no different and it was pretty successful in this aspect as it was one of the most tweeted shows in 2017. Also, the producers are working on the 2nd season of the program indicating the reasonably good viewership for season 1.

The article mentions that the “The overall negative impact of the show overshadows the minimal positive effects, rendering it entirely counterproductive to its goals.” While it true that the online searches for suicide mentions went up significantly during and after the show, but the show created awareness about the causes leading to suicide. It is important to note that the show is not a documentary on various issues which could possibly lead to suicide or suicidal thoughts and hence the need to create a shock value. Had it been a staid documentary, I am sure we would not have been talking about the series.
It is important to mention an key point that in today’s time, despite all the progress in healthcare, we are still not comfortable to talk about mental wellbeing related topics like depression, slut shaming, bullying, etc openly. It might seem obvious that after an accident, you go to a doctor to get treated for the wounds but if you require mental support after an incident, it continues to be a big no-no. Even today, going to a psychotherapist is still seen as a stigma or mental imbalance. Also, it is not that there is ample evidence that shows like ‘13 reason why’ did result in a sharp increase in suicide rates. However, suicide rates have been on the increase in various countries and one of the key reasons is that we don’t have enough conversation to understand the underlying issues. Good or bad, shows like ‘13 reasons why’ force the various parties – parents, educators, friends to take notice of the issues and hopefully start talking. I think that the show gave us a ‘wake-up call’ and forced us to look at the ugly issues which completely destroy a teen. As there is stigma attached to talk about mental wellbeing, only a higher level of conversations can prepare the teens to be ready and handle various issues.

While I am not in favour of showing graphic details of the suicide as it might ‘inspire’ impressionable minds, but accordingly to the writers and I hesitatingly accept the logic, showcasing such graphic details was important to break the impression that suicide is about popping a pill and having a peaceful death but the whole process can be an extremely painful affair. There are now stories on few news portal which mentions about teens turning away from suicide after seeing the pain involved. In fact one of the writers changed his mind about committing suicide once he got to know how painful the whole process could beThe other important aspect that has been overlooked about the show is a Netflix commissioned study done by Northwestern University’s Center on Media and Human Development. The purpose of the survey was to understand how young adults watching the streaming show felt about what is depicted in Hannah's story.
Some of the insight makes for an interesting argument against the article. According to the study, 78% of viewers believed that the series helped them understand that their actions can have an impact on others. 73% decided to be more considerate about how they treated other people following their view of season 1. 51% percent said they reached out to someone they hurt after being inspired by Hannah and Clay's story.
To conclude, I am divided about the impact the show has created but I am glad that any conversations sparked will only help in creating more awareness and help in dealing with the issues and hopefully resulting in saving of more lives in the future.



Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Burari Deaths: The Psychopathology of Lalit, a Biopsychosocial Perspective

Pankhudi Narayan Blogpost 1  TW: Death, mentions of suicide.         On July 1st of 2018, eleven members of a family were found dead in their shared home in the Burari area of Delhi. The deaths seemed to be fashioned in a ritualistic manner and evidence suggested that the family members were willing participants. This was the Bhatia family, a typical middle-class Indian joint family. Bhopal Singh who had passed away and his wife Narayani Devi formed the older generations of the family and were Lalith’s parents. The most compelling evidence in the uncovering of the events that led to the death of an entire family was provided by eleven diaries found by authorities. The diaries described the events that transpired before the deaths, discussing a ritual that needed to be conducted and the diary entries were corroborated by the post mortem findings as the accounts were found to be consistent with injuries (Yadav et al., 2021). It was uncovered that Lalit, a member of the family who was the
Post a Comment
Read more

Made in Heaven: An analysis of Faiza Naqvi

Vyoma Vijai Blog Post 3 ‘Made in Heaven’ is a popular Indian web series created by Zoya Akhtar and Reema Kaagti and was launched in March 2018. The show gained a lot of attention in the first few days of it coming out. It is a bold show that focuses on marriage practices in the rich and elite class of Delhi. The show focuses on the social issues and practices that are often not spoken of or are kept closeted. These issues include homosexuality, dowry, molestation and other questionable Indian customs. The story follows the lives of multiple characters at the same time. The two most important characters are Tara and Karan who run a wedding planning agency.   Tara is married to a rich industrialist whose name is Adil and her best friend in the show is Faiza, played by Kalki Koechlin. This essay analyses Faiza’s character and her role in this web series. Faiza is a complex character to understand. Her actions make it hard for the viewers to decide whether they l
Post a Comment
Read more

Disorderly Delvian: A Deep Dive into "Anna Delvey" through the Lens of NPD

       A markedly thick accent, a mop of blonde hair, a magical array of unimaginably expensive clothing, and an air of calculated mystery mesh uncomfortably together to invent Anna Delvey, the centre of Netflix’s appropriately named documentary/drama series, “Inventing Anna”. This series tells or rather retells the fascinating story of how one woman deceived the creme de la creme of New York society as well as some prestigious financial institutions under the guise that she was a wealthy heiress from Germany. The series follows a journalist, Vivian Kent, as she tries to uncover the carefully constructed web of lies Anna spun around high society after her arrest, heavily interspersed by flashbacks, present-day court hearings, and interviews with the enigma herself (Shondaland, 2022). Anna as a character, infused with a troubling reality and a dramatised narrative, presents an interesting scope to study the symptomatology of Narcissistic Personality Disorder as presented in her behaviou
Post a Comment
Read more